Battle heats up as Africa rallies against Israel’s AU observer

Read Time: 6 minutes

As a modern-day colonial power, Israel offends the anti-colonial spirit of the African Union (AU) and until it ends its occupation of Palestine, Israel cannot play any role at the AU. This is the message from dozens of political and civil society groups in Africa – who together with several African governments – are protesting the July 22 decision by AU Commission chairperson, Moussa Faki Mahamat, to grant Israel observer status at the continental union. 

Unprecedented African solidarity 
The Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) in Botswana, and the Labor Economists and Afrikan Democrats (LEAD) in Zimbabwe joined forces with Namibia’s Landless People’s Movement and the Centre for People’s Resistance, the Socialist Forum of Ghana, the Pan-Afrikan Renaissance group in Uganda, Guinea’s All-African Revolutionary People’s Party, Economic Fighters League of Ghana, and the Revolutionary Socialist League of Kenya to call on AU member states to reject Mahamat’s decision, and discuss the matter at the next session of the AU executive council.

Coming together as the Pan-African Palestine Solidarity Network (PAPSN), the groups were joined by the Botswana Federation of Public Private and Parastatal Sector Unions (BOFEPUSU), the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions, Socialist Students and Workers Network in Ghana, the Ghanaian branch of the International Socialist Organization, as well as Palestine solidarity organizations from Malawi, Mauritius, Tanzania, Senegal, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Kenya and South Africa. Environmental and development activists from Kenya and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) along with religious groups from Nigeria and South Africa are also part of the collective. 

The wide representation of groups from across Africa is unprecedented in terms of Palestine solidarity, and more groups are joining the network, says PAPSN spokesperson, William Shoki. An unintended consequence of Israel gaining AU observer status is the mobilization of groups and outpouring of support and solidarity for Palestine from almost every region of Africa. 

In a strong statement, PAPSN described Mahamat’s decision as “undemocratic and unilateral”, sidestepping the AU’s norms of procedure. This, says Shoki, “risks undermining the stability and credibility of the AU.”

Shoki says that Israel wants observer status – not to assist Africa as claimed – but to dilute AU criticism of its illegal occupation of Palestine.  “By gaining observer status and being part of AU meetings and debates, Israel wants to justify its apartheid policies against Palestinians.” The AU has strongly and consistently called out Israel’s violations of international law and its use of illegal, lethal force against Palestinians at its summits.

“How can we take seriously Israel’s statements that it wants to help Africa when the Israeli government openly displays its contempt for people from the continent,” Shoki asked, referencing the racism faced within Israel by African asylum seekers from Eritrea, Sudan and Ethiopia. “A country which treats African people in such a degrading and racist manner should not be rewarded with observer status at the African Union,” he added.

Protests at the Pan-African Parliament
On Wednesday, South African activists from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) picketed outside the Pan-African Parliament (PAP) in Johannesburg. PSC took the action at PAP as it is the legislative body of the AU and is intended as a platform for discussions and decision-making on issues facing the AU. 

PSC members handed over a memorandum on behalf of PAPSN to the AU leadership calling for Israel’s AU accreditation to be revoked. According to PSC spokesperson and former South African government minister and freedom fighter, Ronnie Kasrils, the memorandum also asks that the matter of Israel’s accreditation be discussed at the next sitting of the PAP plenary, and that a motion of censure be passed on Mahamat for his unilateral action. 

Online protests
With Covid-19 restrictions still in place, pro-Palestine groups in Malawi, Uganda, and Kenya took their protests online, and their petitions have been signed by several thousand Africans. Such strong and visible solidarity in these countries is significant since Israel considers these nations important allies.  

“We paid dearly in our liberation struggle to overthrow British colonialism and refuse to associate ourselves in any way with Israel and its murderous regime,” says Zahid Rajan of Kenyans 4 Palestine. He called Mahamat’s decision “an indictment and betrayal by the AU of the African people.”

The Mauritian Palestine solidarity movement, meanwhile, has called on the government of Mauritius to oppose Israel’s observer status, and follow the example of South Africa and other African states that have rejected Israel’s admission as an observer to the AU. “On what grounds is Israel being given observer status at the AU? Nothing has changed in Israel’s illegal military occupation and colonization of Palestinian territory since it was refused this status by the AU [previously]” asked Alain Ah Vee of Solidarite Morisyin Avek Lepep Palestinn (SOMALP) in a letter to Minister of Foreign Affairs, Alan Ganoo. 

South Africa was one of the first countries to reject Mahamat’s decision, and called on the AU Commission head to explain his decision, which was taken without consultation with AU members. Neighboring states Namibia, Lesotho, Botswana and Mozambique have issued similar statements. 

While Pretoria mobilized Southern African countries, Algeria rallied North and East African countries to request that the matter be discussed at the next AU executive council meeting. The embassies of Mauritania, Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Comoros and Djibouti submitted a letter of objection to the AU, arguing that Mahamat’s actions had violated the AU’s procedures and principles. As a result of these objections, the matter will be discussed at the next meeting of the AU executive scheduled for October 13-14.

Notable silence
Some countries, however, have been notable in their silence on the issue. 

Continental powerhouse, Nigeria, has yet to publicly comment. Nigerian president Muhammadu Buhari blocked Israel’s participation at the summit of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in 2016. However, relations between Israel and Nigeria seem to be warming, and in 2018 Buhari invited then Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to attend Nigeria’s Democracy Day celebrations. Nigeria is expected to quietly oppose Mahamat’s decision, when the issue comes up at the AU executive meeting. 

Emboldened by Gulf countries normalizing relations with Israel, Sudan – once regarded as the “ground zero” of the Arab boycott of Israel – has also established relations with Israel to improve its relationship with western powers. Fresh from being removed from the United States terror list and having $14.1 billion of its international debt recently cancelled, Khartoum is unlikely to denounce the AU decision. Neither will Morocco – a former historic supporter of the Palestinians.

In exchange for Washington’s recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over occupied Western Sahara, Rabat also normalized ties with Israel last year as part of the Abraham Accords.  The Morocco-Israel relationship is progressing at such a rapid pace that embassies are expected to be opened in both countries within two months. According to observers, Morocco, along with Rwanda, is widely seen as being central to Mahamat’s decision to grant Israel observer status at the AU.

The battle for Africa continues 
For over a decade, Israel has lobbied hard for observer status at the AU, finding support in west, central and east Africa.

 In April, Aliza Bin-Noun, newly-appointed head of the Israeli foreign ministry’s Africa section, met 30 ambassadors of AU member states at the AU headquarters in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, to gauge their support for Israel’s observer status bid. Bin-Noun’s deputy was back a month later to continue lobbying. The support of DRC leader, current AU president and vocal pro-Israel advocate Felix Tshisekedi, was crucial. Mahamat is also supportive of Israel being at the AU, judging by an unapologetic statement released on August 7. Israel, it seems, has support within the highest levels of the AU leadership.

Israel will fiercely protect its accreditation when the AU’s executive council meets in October. That meeting is likely to be heated, says Na’eem Jeenah, director of the Afro-Middle East Centre in Johannesburg.

“Traditionally, the AU prefers to make decisions by consensus rather than through voting. If that is the case in October, then we can expect that, after much debate, the executive committee will ultimately decide that there is no consensus on the matter and the objections of the states will be upheld,” explains Jeenah.

But the pro-Israel lobby within the AU will be preparing for a battle. Israel’s politicians realize the importance of its admission as an observer to the AU as a valuable means of countering the narrative of Israel as a settler-colonial, apartheid state.

If the matter does go to a vote, anything is possible, given the AU’s lack of concrete policy on relations with Israel and the double-speak that characterizes many African nations’ relationship with both Israel and the Palestinians. 

Whatever the outcome of the Executive Council meeting, it is likely that the issue will also be tabled at the AU Summit of Heads of States in January. 

@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Leave a Reply