Trump Twitter ‘hack’: Police accept attacker’s claim


Read Time: 2 minutes
Dutch prosecutors have found a hacker did successfully log in to Donald Trump’s Twitter account by guessing his password – “MAGA2020!”

But they will not be punishing Victor Gevers, who was acting “ethically”.

Mr Gevers shared what he said were screenshots of the inside of Mr Trump’s account on 22 October, during the final stages of the US presidential election.

But at the time, the White House denied it had been hacked and Twitter said it had no evidence of it.

In reference to the latest development, Twitter said: “We’ve seen no evidence to corroborate this claim, including from the article published in the Netherlands today. We proactively implemented account security measures for a designated group of high-profile, election-related Twitter accounts in the United States, including federal branches of government.”

The White House has not responded to a request for further comment.

A screenshot of Donald Trump's Twitter account
image captionMr Gevers had previously shared this screenshot that appeared to show him editing Donald Trump’s Twitter profile information

Mr Gevers said he was very happy with the outcome.

“This is not just about my work but all volunteers who look for vulnerabilities in the internet,” he said.

The well respected cyber-security researcher said he had been conducting a semi-regular sweep of the Twitter accounts of high-profile US election candidates, on 16 October, when he had guessed President Trump’s password.

Victor Gevers
image captionVictor Gevers has been discovering security flaws in software and websites for 22 years

Dutch police said: “The hacker released the login himself.

“He later stated to police that he had investigated the strength of the password because there were major interests involved if this Twitter account could be taken over so shortly before the presidential election.”

They had sent the US authorities their findings, they added.

Mr Gevers had told officers he had substantially more evidence of the “hack”.

In theory, he would have been able to see all the president’s data, including:

  • private photos and messages
  • privately bookmarked tweets
  • how many people he had blocked

The president’s account, which has 89 million followers, is now secure.

But Twitter has refused to answer direct questions from BBC News, including whether the account had extra security or logs that would have shown an unknown login.

Earlier this year, Mr Gevers also claimed he and other security researchers had logged in to Mr Trump’s Twitter account in 2016 using a password – “yourefired” – linked to another of his social-network accounts in a previous data breach.

Source: BBC


48 thoughts on “Trump Twitter ‘hack’: Police accept attacker’s claim

  1. I strongly recommend steer clear of this site. The experience I had with it was only frustration as well as concerns regarding scamming practices. Proceed with extreme caution, or alternatively, find a more reputable service to fulfill your requirements.

  2. I strongly recommend stay away from this site. The experience I had with it was purely frustration and concerns regarding deceptive behavior. Proceed with extreme caution, or alternatively, look for an honest site to meet your needs.

  3. I urge you steer clear of this platform. My personal experience with it was only disappointment and suspicion of scamming practices. Exercise extreme caution, or better yet, find a trustworthy site to fulfill your requirements.

  4. I highly advise to avoid this platform. My own encounter with it was nothing but dismay as well as suspicion of fraudulent activities. Proceed with extreme caution, or better yet, find a trustworthy site to meet your needs.

  5. I strongly recommend steer clear of this site. My personal experience with it was purely disappointment along with doubts about scamming practices. Proceed with extreme caution, or even better, find a more reputable platform for your needs.

  6. I strongly recommend stay away from this site. My personal experience with it has been purely frustration and suspicion of scamming practices. Proceed with extreme caution, or better yet, find a trustworthy site to meet your needs.

  7. I strongly recommend steer clear of this site. My own encounter with it was purely disappointment and doubts about scamming practices. Proceed with extreme caution, or even better, look for an honest site to fulfill your requirements.

  8. I highly advise to avoid this platform. My personal experience with it was purely disappointment along with concerns regarding fraudulent activities. Proceed with extreme caution, or better yet, look for a more reputable site to meet your needs.

  9. I highly advise stay away from this site. The experience I had with it has been purely disappointment and concerns regarding deceptive behavior. Exercise extreme caution, or even better, seek out a more reputable service to meet your needs.

  10. I strongly recommend steer clear of this site. My personal experience with it was only disappointment and suspicion of deceptive behavior. Proceed with extreme caution, or better yet, find a trustworthy site for your needs.

  11. I strongly recommend steer clear of this site. My own encounter with it has been purely dismay and doubts about scamming practices. Proceed with extreme caution, or even better, seek out a more reputable platform for your needs.

  12. I strongly recommend to avoid this site. The experience I had with it has been purely dismay and doubts about scamming practices. Exercise extreme caution, or alternatively, seek out an honest service to fulfill your requirements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *