EXPLOITATION OF VULNERABLE WOMEN IN GHANA BY FOREIGN NATIONALS: THE RUSSIAN MAN INCIDENT

Introduction

This paper examines how foreign nationals exploit the vulnerabilities of Ghanaian women, focusing on the illustrative “Russian man incident” to delineate the mechanisms and consequences of such exploitation. Specifically, it investigates the socioeconomic factors that render Ghanaian women susceptible to manipulation by foreign actors and the resulting negative impacts on their lives and national security (Mensah et al., 2025; Netshivhambe, 2024). It further explores the evolving landscape of cybercrime and human trafficking, where gender roles are increasingly manipulated, and vulnerabilities are leveraged for illicit gains (Alhassan & Ridwan, 2021). The discussion will also encompass the broader implications of these predatory practices, considering their societal and economic ramifications beyond individual victimisation (Thumboo & Mukherjee, 2024). This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between gender inequality, transnational crime, and digital vulnerabilities, thereby contributing to the development of robust counter-exploitation strategies (Lazarus et al., 2025; Vijeyarasa, 2016). This paper aims to elucidate the multifaceted nature of these vulnerabilities, drawing parallels with global patterns of human trafficking and cyber-fraud that disproportionately affect women (Okolie-Osemene, 2017; Virkkunen & Piipponen, 2021). This phenomenon is particularly salient in regions like Ghana, where the intersection of economic precarity and the pervasive nature of online interactions creates fertile ground for exploitation, often manifesting in sophisticated online dating and romance scams (Alhassan & Ridwan, 2021; Ghann et al., 2022). These schemes frequently leverage gendered expectations and economic disparities, presenting foreign perpetrators as offering pathways to financial stability or marital opportunities, which can be particularly alluring in contexts of limited local economic prospects (Okolie-Osemene, 2017). The migration patterns of foreign nationals, particularly those involved in cybercrime, further exacerbate these vulnerabilities, as seen in the movement of online romance fraudsters from Nigeria to Ghana, establishing sophisticated scamming enterprises (Lazarus et al., 2025). This migration has transformed Ghana into a hub for cybercrime, particularly romance fraud, where perpetrators exploit the digital landscape to target and manipulate individuals, including vulnerable women (Barnor et al., 2025). These fraudulent activities often build emotional connections with victims, fabricating romantic or platonic relationships that subsequently evolve into collaborative entrepreneurial ventures, leading to financial exploitation (Cross, 2018; Luong, 2025). This type of exploitation often intersects with broader cybercrime frameworks, where socioeconomic and psychosocial motivations drive perpetrators to leverage digital platforms for illicit financial gain through deceptive practices (Lazarus, 2019). This aligns with the Tripartite Cybercrime Framework, which categorizes such digital offenses based on their socioeconomic and psychosocial underpinnings (Lazarus, 2019). Such tactics often culminate in “cyber slavery,” a contemporary form of forced criminality where individuals are coerced into participating in illicit digital activities, frequently under duress and with profound implications for victim autonomy and legal recourse (Sarkar & Shukla, 2025). This phenomenon underscores the necessity of analyzing the political economy of cybercrime, as it reveals how structural inequalities and power dynamics contribute to the perpetuation of digital exploitation. The proliferation of online fraud activities, including romance scams, in Ghana, as evidenced by the local phenomenon of “Sakawa,” further illustrates the exploitation of digital spaces for financial gain (“Mistrust,” 2018; Mpuru & Kgoale, 2025). These schemes often exploit societal gender roles and financial disparities, as men in certain cultural contexts, such as Nigeria, are socialized to be primary providers, increasing their susceptibility to financial pressures that can lead them to cyber-fraud (Lazarus, 2019). This systemic vulnerability is further amplified by evolving cybercrime networks in West Africa, where informal mentorship, diasporic connections, and cultural legitimizations of fraud facilitate sophisticated operations (Barnor, 2025). This environment often leverages advanced social engineering techniques, algorithmic profiling, and automated outreach to ensnare individuals into exploitative digital labor, circumventing traditional border controls and establishing a high-profit, low-risk model of cyber-trafficking (Sarkar & Shukla, 2025). These elaborate schemes often culminate in “pig butchering” scams, where victims are meticulously groomed over time before being coerced into fraudulent investment opportunities, leading to substantial financial losses and emotional distress (Lazarus et al., 2025).

Literature Review

This section reviews the existing academic literature on the exploitation of vulnerable populations through digital means, focusing on romance scams, cyber-trafficking, and the broader context of cybercrime in West Africa. It specifically examines how these illicit activities exploit societal gender roles and economic disparities, often leveraging advanced social engineering techniques and algorithmic profiling to ensnare individuals into exploitative digital labor (Lazarus et al., 2025; Oak & Shafiq, 2025). These online romance scams, which exploit individuals’ desire for romantic relationships, have become a prevalent form of cybercrime, causing significant financial and emotional harm to victims globally (Thumboo & Mukherjee, 2024). In Ghana, women are particularly susceptible to these scams due to a confluence of factors, including economic precarity, limited digital literacy, and prevailing social norms that can exacerbate their vulnerability to manipulative online overtures (Agyare, 2025; Balakrishnan et al., 2025). The modus operandi of these scams often involves long-term engagements where perpetrators cultivate a sense of mutual feeling, ultimately tricking victims into parting with substantial sums of money (“The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse,” 2021). This manipulative process aligns with broader trends in cybercrime where individuals are coerced into participating in illicit financial transactions, blurring the lines between victim and unwitting accomplice, as some research indicates voluntary participation in criminal enterprises among certain West African cybercriminals (Abubakari & Błaszczyk, 2023). This complex interplay of coercion and perceived voluntariness necessitates a nuanced understanding of victim-offender dynamics in the context of cyber-enabled exploitation. This study aims to examine the specific mechanisms through which foreign nationals exploit the vulnerabilities of Ghanaian women through sophisticated online romance scams, drawing insights from the “pig butchering” scam model (Wang, 2024). This model, while relatively recent, has been increasingly scrutinized by researchers due to its significant financial and emotional impact on victims (Acharya & Holz, 2024; Oak & Shafiq, 2025). Specifically, it will analyze how these foreign actors leverage deceptive recruitment practices, manipulation tactics, and transnational criminal networks to target Ghanaian women, often involving elements of cyber-human trafficking (Lazarus et al., 2025). This analysis will consider the growth of Ghana’s ICT sector and the concurrent rise in cyber-related threats, which complicate the adjudication of such sophisticated criminal offenses (Ennin & Mensah, 2019). Furthermore, this study will critically assess the limitations of current legal frameworks and law enforcement responses in addressing these technologically advanced and transnational cybercrimes. The objective is to delineate the operational methodologies employed by these foreign nationals, explore the socioeconomic and psychological vulnerabilities that predispose Ghanaian women to such exploitation, and propose targeted policy interventions to mitigate these risks. This research will also explore the challenges associated with prosecuting these extraterritorial crimes and the effectiveness of international cooperation in bringing perpetrators to justice, especially given the complexities of jurisdictional issues in cybercrime (Ennin & Mensah, 2019). It will delve into the societal impact of these crimes, particularly focusing on the long-term psychological and economic consequences for victims, and evaluate the efficacy of existing cybercrime frameworks in addressing this evolving threat landscape. It will further investigate the migration patterns of cybercriminals, particularly from Nigeria to Ghana, and how these movements facilitate the institutionalization of scamming enterprises (Lazarus et al., 2025). This transnational dimension underscores the necessity of a multifaceted approach to cybercrime prevention and enforcement, involving international collaboration and harmonized legal frameworks to effectively combat these evolving threats. It will also consider the cultural dimensions that contribute to the normalization of such activities within certain communities, drawing on theories of moral disengagement to explain how perpetrators rationalize their actions (Abubakari, 2025). This comprehensive examination will leverage a case study of the “Russian man incident” to provide empirical context and illuminate the practical application of these theoretical constructs, thereby offering a detailed analysis of how foreign nationals exploit specific vulnerabilities in Ghana’s digital landscape. This approach will illuminate the specific linguistic and communicative strategies employed by criminals within Ghana’s cyber environment, bridging a critical gap in understanding how language facilitates cybercriminal subcultures (Mensah et al., 2024). This includes an examination of how multilingualism, prevalent in Ghana, can be leveraged by perpetrators to enhance deceptive communication and bypass detection mechanisms (Mensah et al., 2024). Furthermore, the study will analyze the digital forensic challenges inherent in tracing these deceptive communications across various platforms and jurisdictions, considering the anonymizing features often employed by cybercriminals (Özer et al., 2025). It will also assess the current digital forensic investigation infrastructure in Ghana, evaluating its capacity to effectively address the sophisticated nature of these transnational cybercrimes and the evidentiary challenges they present (Apau & Koranteng, 2020). This investigation will specifically utilize a qualitative research methodology, employing a grounded theory approach to generate theoretical insights from empirical data obtained through in-depth interviews with law enforcement, victims, and cybersecurity experts (AllahRakha, 2024; Mensah et al., 2023). This will enable the identification of emergent themes and patterns of exploitation, contributing to a robust understanding of the mechanisms of vulnerability and manipulation in online romance scams. This inductive approach will facilitate the dynamic identification of underlying issues, the relationships between key challenges, and emerging themes within the legal and digital forensic data (Rakha, 2024). Specifically, the research design will encompass semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations to gather rich, contextual data regarding the communication symbolism and social dynamics within deviant and criminal subcultures associated with these scams (Mensah et al., 2024). Open coding will be employed to identify and label significant concepts and categories emerging from the data (AllahRakha, 2024). Subsequent axial coding will then categorize and connect these concepts, ultimately leading to selective coding where a core category representing the central phenomenon will be developed (Rakha, 2024). This iterative process of data collection and analysis, characteristic of grounded theory, allows for the continuous refinement of theoretical constructs as new evidence emerges (Littman & Kessler, 2011). This methodological rigor ensures a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between technological vulnerabilities, socio-cultural factors, and criminal exploitation in the Ghanaian context. This qualitative approach is particularly suitable for exploring the lived experiences of victims, as it allows for an in-depth understanding of the psychological, financial, and legal consequences of such technologically facilitated violence (Cole, 2024; Whitty & Buchanan, 2015). By focusing on the subjective interpretations and meanings attributed to these experiences, this study aims to construct a nuanced theoretical framework that elucidates the intricate dynamics of foreign nationals exploiting Ghanaian women through cyber-human trafficking (Dwight, 2023; Jaraba, 2024). The constructivist grounded theory methodology will enable the development of a theoretical framework rooted in the participants’ perspectives, offering a deep understanding of the phenomenon of cyber-human trafficking (Fatima et al., 2024; Karakaş, 2024). This approach is critical for uncovering the underlying power dynamics and systemic issues that contribute to the vulnerability of women in Ghana to such sophisticated exploitation (Borges, 2024). This will involve constant comparative analysis between and within texts, as well as between categories, to develop theoretical concepts from the collected data (Anitha et al., 2017). This iterative process, from open to axial to selective coding, ensures the scientificity and reliability of the research process by rigorously establishing relationships between concepts and identifying core categories (Wolbers et al., 2024; Zhang & Shen, 2025). This rigorous analytical framework is designed to provide a comprehensive and empirically grounded understanding of the specific conditions that enable such exploitation, allowing for the formulation of targeted and effective interventions.

Methodology

The qualitative research design for this study utilizes a constructivist grounded theory approach to investigate how foreign nationals exploit vulnerabilities in Ghana, focusing on the “Russian man incident” as a case study (Mészáros & Kelemen-Erdős, 2023; Olivo et al., 2021). This inductive approach will allow for the emergence of theoretical insights directly from the data, thereby providing a nuanced understanding of the eco-socio and political factors contributing to the vulnerabilities exploited (Zengenene, 2020). This methodological choice aligns with the aim of developing a theory rooted in empirical observation, elucidating the complex interplay between systemic vulnerabilities and individual experiences (Kibuku et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023). The study will therefore involve in-depth interviews with affected women, law enforcement officials, and cybersecurity experts to gather diverse perspectives on the phenomenon of cyber-human trafficking (Borges, 2023). This comprehensive approach will integrate an analysis of the legal frameworks, migration patterns, and socioeconomic characteristics within Ghana to contextualize the vulnerabilities exploited (Gewinner & Salvino, 2021; Khamzin et al., 2023). The data analysis will follow a constant comparative method, moving from initial coding to focused and theoretical coding, to identify recurring themes and categories that illuminate the mechanisms of exploitation and the ensuing impacts (Fernandes et al., 2021). This iterative process will ensure a robust and persuasive theory development, reflecting the lived realities and complexities of the issue (Conteh, 2024). The iterative coding process, progressing through open, axial, and selective stages, will facilitate the systematic identification and categorization of emergent concepts, enabling the construction of a robust theoretical framework (Channamallu et al., 2025; Lebni et al., 2023). This approach acknowledges that the phenomenon under investigation is not static but rather dynamically constructed through social interactions and interpretations (Demetis & Kietzmann, 2021). This emic perspective, where researchers act as insiders, co-constructs the data without influencing respondents, thereby ensuring the authentic representation of participant experiences (Dube & Mohanty, 2022; Fernandes et al., 2021). The constructivist grounded theory, by focusing on the co-construction of experiences and meanings between researchers and participants, ensures that the developed theory is deeply embedded in the subjective realities of those affected (Dwight, 2023). This allows for an intersectional understanding of women’s experiences and contexts, shaped by the goals and values of feminist research (Anitha et al., 2017). This systematic and transparent approach will involve a comprehensive search of relevant databases to identify existing literature on human trafficking, gender inequalities, and women’s experiences with multiple social identities, thus ensuring a broad evidentiary base for analysis (Islam & Fay, 2024). The rigorous application of constructivist grounded theory, including the systematic process of initial, focused, and theoretical coding, will facilitate the emergence of robust theoretical insights directly from the collected data (Coetzer-Liversage et al., 2024). This will involve a constant comparison of data segments to identify similarities and differences, ensuring the validity of emerging codes and themes (Cimino & Degani, 2023). Furthermore, this method facilitates the identification of core categories and their interrelationships, culminating in a coherent theoretical narrative that explains the observed phenomena (Urone et al., 2023). This systematic approach, characterized by iterative data collection and analysis, will allow for the development of a descriptive and interpretive theory of women’s experiences as victims of such exploitation (Gregory et al., 2025). The analytical process will rigorously apply open, axial, and selective coding to discern patterns and generate theoretical constructs directly from the qualitative data (Akbari et al., 2024; Boyle & Barker, 2006; Hart-Johnson, 2017). This methodological rigor ensures that the resulting theoretical framework is empirically grounded and reflective of the complex lived experiences of the women involved (Borges, 2024; Jops et al., 2016). This aligns with feminist research perspectives, which value women’s lived experiences as legitimate sources of knowledge and aim to transform personal narratives into broader social contexts (Christianson et al., 2020). Moreover, the iterative nature of grounded theory, particularly the constant comparative method, will enable researchers to continually refine theoretical categories and properties as new data emerges, enhancing the robustness and explanatory power of the developed theory (Jackson et al., 2018). This will involve building the research team’s skills in inductive analysis to ensure that identified themes are strongly linked to the data collected during interviews, thereby producing theories that are truly reflective of the empirical evidence (Cerezo et al., 2019). The analytical approach will integrate insights from intersectionality theory to capture the complex interplay of gender, socio-economic status, and national origin in shaping vulnerability and exploitation (Sagor & Aktar, 2023). This will ensure that the developed theoretical framework accounts for the multifaceted nature of disadvantage and its impact on the experiences of women susceptible to such exploitation. This comprehensive framework will enable the identification of specific vulnerabilities and mechanisms of exploitation, contributing to the development of nuanced prevention and intervention strategies. The meticulous deconstruction of raw textual data into meaningful units through open, axial, and selective coding will ensure that initial categories and concepts emerge directly from the empirical observations, rather than imposing pre-existing theoretical constructs (Deldar-Abad-Paskeh et al., 2025). This process involves an iterative comparison of codes and categories, leading to the refinement of emergent themes and the eventual construction of a substantive theory (Mutola et al., 2021; Scoular et al., 2023; Sharpless et al., 2024). Theoretical sampling will then be employed to seek out additional data that can further elaborate and saturate these emergent categories, ultimately leading to a comprehensive and empirically-grounded theoretical model (Mohajan, 2022; Opperdoes et al., 2025).

ResultsThe subsequent sections present the empirical findings derived from the aforementioned rigorous methodological process, detailing the specific vulnerabilities identified among women in Ghana and the sophisticated tactics employed by foreign nationals to exploit these susceptibilities.

This analysis will illuminate the sophisticated methodologies employed by perpetrators, ranging from psychological manipulation to leveraging socio-economic disparities, to achieve their exploitative objectives. The discussion will further elucidate how these exploitation mechanisms are often embedded within a broader context of gendered inequality and socioeconomic hardship, which collectively exacerbate the vulnerability of women (Islam & Khan, 2025).

This exploration will also highlight the critical role of intersectionality in understanding how various social identities and power dynamics converge to heighten women’s susceptibility to exploitation (Samarakoon et al., 2022). Such an analysis is crucial for developing targeted interventions and policy frameworks that address the root causes of vulnerability and enhance protective measures for at-risk populations. The study utilized semi-structured qualitative interviews with practitioners involved in anti-trafficking interventions in Ghana to gather rich narratives on identifying traffickers and supporting victims (Mbamba et al., 2022). This approach facilitated a deep understanding of both the overt and subtle manifestations of exploitation, alongside the systemic challenges faced in providing adequate support to survivors (Klabbers et al., 2023). These interviews, adhering to a rigorous thematic analysis framework, allowed for the identification of recurrent patterns and emerging themes concerning recruitment tactics, vulnerability factors, and the efficacy of current intervention strategies (Asante & Yirenkyi, 2026; Shepherd et al., 2021). The emergent themes were rigorously categorized and analyzed to achieve thematic saturation, ensuring that the findings comprehensively represent the multifaceted experiences of both the exploited women and the practitioners striving to combat this issue (Barrington et al., 2021; Ofosu et al., 2022). The subsequent discussion will therefore synthesize these empirical insights to construct a comprehensive understanding of the exploitative dynamics at play, providing a foundation for evidence-based policy recommendations. Specifically, the study involved 26 interviews with migrant women, focusing on their experiences and highlighting the themes of informal recruitment networks, hazardous working conditions, and economic vulnerability that make them susceptible to exploitation (Fernández‐Sánchez et al., 2025; Rossoni & Woude, 2025). These findings align with broader research indicating that migrant women frequently encounter precarious employment conditions, gender-based violence, and human trafficking due to structural vulnerabilities within labor markets (Chadambuka et al., 2025). These informal recruitment channels, often managed by brokers, exacerbate precarity by operating outside regulatory frameworks, thereby increasing susceptibility to forced labor and exploitative practices (Deshingkar et al., 2019). This precariousness is further compounded by factors such as debt bondage, false promises, and confiscation of identity documents, which significantly restrict victims’ ability to leave exploitative situations (ElDidi et al., 2022; Johannes et al., 2023). The qualitative data, derived from in-depth interviews, offers critical insights into the lived realities and perceptions of these women, further illuminating the mechanisms through which their vulnerabilities are leveraged for exploitation (Achana & Tanle, 2021; Ali & Alpaslan, 2017; Langmagne et al., 2019). Furthermore, the analysis meticulously categorizes the nuanced methods of coercion, deception, and control employed by foreign perpetrators, thereby dissecting the psychological and logistical frameworks that underpin such exploitative enterprises. These insights reveal how perpetrators systematically leverage misinformation, recruitment fees, and identity document confiscation, alongside debt and grooming, to establish a regime of enmeshment that begins with the abuse of vulnerability and progresses through recruitment deception into coercive control (Fletcher & Trautrims, 2023). This comprehensive understanding of the perpetrators’ modus operandi is essential for developing targeted interventions that disrupt these exploitative cycles and enhance the protective mechanisms for vulnerable populations (Doyle et al., 2018).

Discussion

The subsequent discussion will critically evaluate these identified vulnerabilities and exploitation mechanisms, contextualizing them within broader socio-economic and geopolitical frameworks. It will also draw parallels with similar cases globally, thereby situating the Ghanaian experience within a comparative international context to highlight universal patterns of vulnerability and exploitation, while simultaneously acknowledging context-specific nuances. This comparative analysis will underscore how informal recruitment networks, often involving personal contacts and acquaintances, significantly heighten the risk of exploitation by operating outside formal regulatory oversight (Fabbri et al., 2023). This lack of formal oversight leaves migrant women particularly susceptible to deceptive practices, including misleading promises of employment and financial security, which ultimately trap them in exploitative situations (Guidi & Berti, 2023). The precarity of these informal arrangements is further compounded by the socio-legal environments in destination countries, which can fail to protect migrant women from labor exploitation and gender-based violence, thus creating systemic barriers to justice and redress (Gore, 2021). This highlights the critical intersection of recruitment practices and systemic vulnerabilities, where deceptive tactics, such as fraudulent job offers and exorbitant recruitment fees, are instrumental in entrapping individuals into human trafficking and forced labor (Fernández‐Sánchez et al., 2025; Lazarus et al., 2025). The ‘abuse of a position of vulnerability’ is often a central element in such scenarios, where individuals fleeing economic hardship or instability are coerced into accepting exploitative conditions due to limited alternatives and a severe power imbalance (Bish et al., 2024). This dynamic is particularly salient in contexts where women, especially those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, are targeted for domestic work or other informal sector jobs, often involving migration, making them reliant on their employers for security and protection (Baison, 2021). This dependency often enables employers in destination countries to exploit migrant workers’ subordination due to factors like gender, language barriers, socioeconomic status, and immigration status (Raigrodski, 2015). This exploitation is frequently exacerbated by the intersection of rigid bureaucratic classifications and gendered stereotypes, which often obscure the complexities of forced versus voluntary migration and limit the recognition of migrant women as deserving victims (Serughetti, 2018). This underscores how immigration regimes and the absence of citizenship rights for migrants contribute significantly to their precarity and reinforce social inequalities, placing them in highly vulnerable positions relative to employers (Sha & Bhuiyan, 2022). This structural vulnerability is further intensified by restrictive migration policies, limited legal recourse, and insufficient access to social support systems in host countries, collectively diminishing their agency and increasing susceptibility to exploitation (Degani et al., 2022; Joyce, 2019). Such systemic vulnerabilities are then leveraged by perpetrators who capitalize on these power imbalances, often through sophisticated psychological manipulation and coercive control, to extract sensitive information or compel illicit acts from the women under threat of exposure or further harm. These manipulative tactics, which often include threats to their families or public shaming, are designed to erode the victims’ psychological resilience and autonomy, rendering them more compliant with demands for sensitive information. This intricate web of psychological, economic, and systemic pressures creates an environment where women, lacking viable alternatives, are compelled to acquiesce to coercive demands (Lewis et al., 2014; Šalamon et al., 2023). This strategic exploitation aligns with the concept of “cyber slavery,” where individuals are coerced into illicit activities, including the extraction of sensitive information, often facilitated by transnational criminal networks (Sarkar & Shukla, 2025). This phenomenon is aggravated by the proliferation of image-based sexual abuse, where intimate media are leveraged as a tool for coercive control, particularly against migrant women who face heightened risks due to their precarious legal and social standing (Henry et al., 2022; Massari et al., 2025). This highlights how structural injustices and inequalities, combined with discriminatory practices rooted in sexism, racism, and xenophobia, create a context-specific vulnerability that perpetrators exploit (Geymonat et al., 2023; Gonzales & Palomino, 2023). The intersection of these vulnerabilities with precarious migration statuses, workplace isolation, and a lack of control over work conditions further amplifies the risk of sexual violence and exploitation, as evidenced by scholarly work on migrant precarity (Boucher, 2024). This comprehensive analysis underscores the urgent need for multifaceted interventions that address not only the immediate risks of exploitation but also the underlying structural inequalities that render women vulnerable to such pervasive forms of abuse. Moreover, the increasing sophistication of digital technologies, including deepfakes and AI-generated content, further exacerbates these vulnerabilities by providing new avenues for cybersexual victimization and complicating efforts for detection and accountability (Mármol et al., 2025). These technological advancements facilitate new forms of digital extortion, where compromising content, whether real or fabricated, can be used to coerce victims into sharing further sensitive information or complying with demands (Laffier & Rehman, 2023). The strategic deployment of such compromised material, often disseminated across various digital platforms, creates an inescapable digital footprint that traffickers exploit to maintain control over their victims (Stephenson et al., 2025). This digital weaponization of personal information, often obtained through psychological manipulation or direct coercion, effectively binds victims to their exploiters, severely limiting their avenues for escape or seeking assistance. This digital leverage is frequently compounded by the perpetrators’ ability to exploit algorithmic biases and privacy vulnerabilities inherent in online platforms, intensifying the victim’s isolation and the difficulty of removing compromised content (Moore, 2024). This complex interplay of digital exploitation and structural vulnerabilities necessitates a re-evaluation of current legal frameworks and platform policies to adequately safeguard individuals, particularly marginalized women, from technologically advanced forms of coercion and information extraction (Agyare, 2025; Mythili & Nagamani, 2025). The proliferation of digital technologies, while offering increased individual autonomy in some contexts, simultaneously creates new avenues for exploitation, widening power disparities between individuals and entities with advanced technological capabilities (Yang, 2023). This necessitates a critical examination of how these digital tools are weaponized to facilitate information extraction and exert control, particularly in the context of international exploitation. The ease with which perpetrators can now generate non-consensual intimate deepfakes with limited technical skills further broadens the scope of potential victims and intensifies digital privacy concerns (Furizal et al., 2025). This technological shift transforms the nature of blackmail, moving beyond reliance on authentic compromising material to include synthetically generated content, profoundly impacting victims by making remediation and content removal more challenging due to the pervasive and evolving nature of these deepfakes (Mezei & Szentgáli-Tóth, 2023). This contributes to an environment where victim-survivors feel perpetually exposed, struggling to ascertain the provenance and extent of their compromised data (Li et al., 2024). This perpetual uncertainty surrounding the veracity and dissemination of digital content amplifies psychological distress and further entrenches coercive control, as victims are left in a constant state of fear regarding potential exposure or reputational damage. This persistent threat environment often leads to social withdrawal and self-isolation, further compounding the victims’ vulnerability and diminishing their capacity to seek assistance or disclose their experiences (Watts et al., 2025). The permanent nature of content once it spreads across the internet and the rapid dissemination of deepfake material exacerbate these privacy violations, making it exceedingly difficult for victims to regain control over their representations (Furizal et al., 2025). This challenge is further compounded by the limitations of current legal and technological frameworks in effectively addressing the rapid creation and dissemination of non-consensual synthetic intimate imagery (Kira, 2024; Umbach et al., 2024). This points to a significant lacuna in protective mechanisms and highlights the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and technological countermeasures to combat the increasingly sophisticated methods of digital exploitation (Dunn, 2024; “Navigating the Dual Nature of Deepfakes: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence AI) Technology,” 2024). Therefore, a multi-pronged approach encompassing legislative reform, technological innovation, and international cooperation is imperative to mitigate these emerging threats and protect vulnerable populations from increasingly sophisticated forms of digital abuse. The advent of artificial intelligence has significantly amplified these risks, as it enables perpetrators to generate highly realistic, yet entirely fabricated, intimate images and videos, commonly known as deepfakes, which can be used for blackmail and coercion, further complicating legal and ethical responses (Dı́az-Garcı́a & Carvalho, 2025; Fletcher et al., 2024). These deepfakes, which have become increasingly prevalent in recent years, enable new forms of image-based sexual abuse that are particularly difficult to combat due to their ease of creation and rapid dissemination across digital platforms (Kira, 2024; Li et al., 2024). This pervasive availability and dissemination render victims powerless, significantly contributing to feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, often leading to social isolation and stigmatization (Laffier & Rehman, 2023; Li et al., 2024). The psychological impacts on victims, including severe emotional distress, trauma, and reputational harm, are profound and often lead to long-term consequences such as anxiety and withdrawal from social life (Ali et al., 2025). The anonymity afforded by decentralized platforms also presents significant challenges to identifying perpetrators of deepfake abuse, further hindering efforts to seek justice and implement preventative measures (Kaur & Kumar, 2024). Indeed, studies indicate that non-consensual deepfake content accounts for a substantial majority (96-98%) of all deepfake material, underscoring the urgent need for robust policy interventions to address this growing threat (Li et al., 2024). The legal landscape, however, often lags behind technological advancements, with many jurisdictions only recently beginning to enact legislation specifically addressing deepfake pornography (Umbach et al., 2024). This legislative lag presents a critical vulnerability, as the absence of clear legal definitions and enforcement mechanisms for deepfake-related offenses leaves victims with inadequate recourse against the escalating problem of technologically facilitated image-based sexual abuse (George, 2024). For example, even with recent legislative efforts like the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023, the full scope of harm from such abuse—including the psychological and reputational damage—is still being grappled with, particularly as deepfake technology continues to evolve in sophistication and accessibility (Ching et al., 2025; Sugiura et al., 2024; Viola & Voto, 2023). This rapid evolution highlights the imperative for dynamic legal frameworks that can adapt to emerging forms of digital abuse rather than react retrospectively to established threats (Dunn, 2024; George, 2024). The accessibility of AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery has drastically increased, perpetuating a culture of non-consent at scale and exacerbating the challenges of prevention and intervention (Ding et al., 2026). This technological trajectory presents significant challenges for legal institutions and regulatory bodies, necessitating an urgent update to existing policies and laws to effectively address the proliferation of deepfake-based pornographic content and its detrimental impact on victims (Furizal et al., 2025). Indeed, despite growing awareness, the ability to identify AI-generated content does not inherently prevent the harm from occurring, as the damage to reputation and relationships can persist even when the content is proven to be fabricated (Bengio et al., 2025). This underscores the critical need for sociotechnical governance frameworks that not only focus on technical prevention but also prioritize robust response mechanisms and victim support, acknowledging the complex interplay between technological capabilities and human vulnerability (Ding & Suresh, 2025). One primary challenge is the nascent nature of laws and regulations pertaining to deepfakes, which may not be sufficiently comprehensive or effective in providing adequate legal protection or avenues for redress (Laffier & Rehman, 2023).

Conclusion

In many instances, proving perpetrator intent for prosecution remains a significant hurdle, thereby undermining the efficacy of existing legislation in curbing the distribution of such illicit material (Sippy et al., 2024). Moreover, the rapid proliferation and international reach of online platforms hosting these materials complicate enforcement efforts, as jurisdictional boundaries often impede effective prosecution and content removal (Li et al., 2024). To address these complex challenges, collaborative efforts among law enforcement, technology companies, and legal professionals are essential for developing innovative detection tools and algorithms, as well as establishing international protocols for cross-border enforcement (Kaur & Kumar, 2024). This holistic approach is crucial given the “malicious technical ecosystem” within which AI-generated non-consensual intimate images are produced and disseminated, often outpacing current governance methods (Ding & Suresh, 2025). Consequently, immediate and substantial investment in robust policy measures, technological advancements, and public awareness campaigns is critical to combat the pervasive threat of AI-generated malicious content and protect vulnerable populations. Such efforts must extend beyond mere content moderation to address the underlying socio-technical factors that facilitate the creation and sharing of such content (Ding & Suresh, 2025). The private and encrypted nature of many platforms where this content is shared further complicates monitoring and removal efforts, necessitating advanced investigative techniques and inter-platform cooperation (Qiwei et al., 2024). The development of global AI content identification frameworks that uphold UN principles of robustness, accessibility, and adaptability is essential for mitigating the challenges posed by varying legal frameworks and geopolitical tensions in addressing malicious deepfakes (Moreno, 2025). This calls for a multi-faceted approach involving legislative harmonization across jurisdictions and the establishment of international collaborative bodies dedicated to combating the global spread of AI-generated malicious content (Kokolaki & Fragopoulou, 2025; “Navigating the Dual Nature of Deepfakes: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence AI) Technology,” 2024). Furthermore, platforms must revise their content policies to explicitly prohibit all forms of image-based sexual abuse, including AI-generated or manipulated content, ensuring robust and unambiguous guidelines that eliminate loopholes based on content type (Kira, 2024). Beyond policy adjustments, the implementation of sophisticated detection tools and AI-based algorithms is crucial for identifying and removing deepfake content across diverse platforms (Alanazi et al., 2024). This necessitates significant investment in advanced machine learning and computer vision techniques capable of discerning synthetic media from authentic content with high accuracy and low latency. This also requires continuous research and development to keep pace with the evolving capabilities of generative AI, which constantly produces more sophisticated and harder-to-detect synthetic media (Al-khazraji et al., 2023). However, technical solutions alone are insufficient, as empirical evidence indicates that all defense mechanisms against deepfakes have ultimately been circumvented by new attack vectors (Shi et al., 2024). Therefore, a comprehensive strategy must integrate technological countermeasures with robust legal frameworks, proactive ethical guidelines for AI developers, and sustained public education initiatives to address the multi-dimensional nature of this threat (Kaur & Kumar, 2024; Nicola & Alice, 2021). This comprehensive strategy must also incorporate international cooperation to harmonize legal responses and establish unified ethical guidelines, as the global nature of deepfake dissemination transcends national borders and regulatory capacities (Moreno, 2025; “Navigating the Dual Nature of Deepfakes: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence AI) Technology,” 2024). Establishing industry standards for deepfake detection and authentication is essential for consistency and reliability, helping to verify the authenticity of media content and providing a clear framework for identifying genuine versus manipulated content (Qureshi, 2024). These standards should ideally include provisions for watermarking and content provenance tracking to enhance transparency and accountability in media creation and distribution (Umbach et al., 2024). Moreover, the development of robust detection tools, leveraging AI and machine learning, is critical to differentiate authentic content from sophisticated deepfakes, though their efficacy requires continuous refinement to counteract evolving generative AI capabilities (Khatiwada et al., 2025).

For instance, advanced machine learning models are being developed to identify subtle patterns characteristic of synthetic media, such as inconsistencies in facial expressions or acoustic signatures, by cross-referencing with extensive fact-checking databases (Kalpokas et al., 2024; Romanishyn et al., 2025). These detection frameworks often incorporate multimodal analysis and real-time verification systems to enhance their robustness against increasingly sophisticated deepfake generation techniques (Garcia, 2025). However, these sophisticated detection systems still face formidable challenges, as diffusion-based generative models produce fewer discernible artifacts than earlier generative adversarial networks, making forensic analysis more complex (Khan et al., 2025). This necessitates continuous research into novel detection methodologies that can adapt to the rapid advancements in generative AI, emphasizing the need for flexible and adaptive legal frameworks that can evolve with technological progress (Singh & Dhumane, 2025; Sulaj, 2025). Such frameworks should outline legal consequences for disseminating malicious deepfake content, provide guidelines for content removal, and establish mechanisms for victims to seek legal recourse, requiring international cooperation due to the global nature of these issues (Al-khazraji et al., 2023). Furthermore, legislative frameworks should consider establishing appropriate penalties for offenders, balancing freedom of speech with the urgent need to protect personal privacy and prevent harm from deepfake content (Alanazi et al., 2024). Additionally, policies should mandate transparency standards, such as watermarking and content labeling, to enable easier identification of AI-generated content and enhance accountability (Abbas et al., 2025; Miotti & Wasil, 2024). These transparency measures are vital for mitigating AI-enabled fraud and deception by establishing clear indicators of synthetic media (Christodorescu et al., 2024). For instance, deepfake detection tools can provide compelling evidence in legal proceedings by comparing real and fabricated content, thereby identifying forgeries (Alanazi et al., 2024). Despite these advancements, the continuous evolution of deepfake technology necessitates ongoing research into detection methods to counter new attack vectors effectively (Moreno, 2025). This constant arms race between generative AI capabilities and detection mechanisms underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, integrating insights from technology, law, and social sciences to establish unified international standards (Zou et al., 2025). Indeed, the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence has enabled the creation of increasingly convincing deepfakes, posing an unprecedented threat to trust and security in the digital world, thereby challenging existing legal frameworks and necessitating novel approaches to fraud detection (Moreno, 2024). This rapid evolution underscores the limitations of current legal frameworks, which often lag behind technological developments, allowing for the unchecked proliferation of misinformation and privacy violations (“Navigating the Dual Nature of Deepfakes: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence AI) Technology,” 2024). Consequently, developing robust legal and policy frameworks, including data protection laws, cybersecurity measures, and regulations specific to AI technologies, is essential to address these emerging challenges (Ferrara, 2024). These frameworks must address issues of accountability for AI developers and users, as well as establish mechanisms for swift enforcement against the malicious deployment of deepfake technologies (Ferrara, 2024). Furthermore, ethical considerations surrounding the use of generative AI in forensic analysis and evidence validation are paramount, particularly when addressing the potential for bias in detection algorithms or the implications for judicial processes (Shahzad et al., 2024). The dynamic interplay between advancing deepfake technology and detection methodologies creates an ongoing “arms race” that necessitates continuous innovation in forensic analysis and AI-driven countermeasures (Babaei et al., 2025; Venkateswarulu & Srinagesh, 2024). This necessitates an examination of the socio-technical vulnerabilities that deepfakes exploit, particularly in contexts where digital literacy and awareness of AI-generated content are limited, thereby exacerbating the potential for deception and manipulation (Casu et al., 2023). Such vulnerabilities can be particularly pronounced in developing nations, where digital infrastructure and regulatory safeguards may be less mature, creating an environment ripe for exploitation by sophisticated actors. This inherent susceptibility is further compounded by the absence of harmonized international standards and robust legal frameworks, which complicates cross-border enforcement and accountability for deepfake-related harms (Alanazi et al., 2025; Ali et al., 2021; Samuel-Okon et al., 2024). The ease with which sophisticated deepfakes can be produced and disseminated, often facilitated by large language models, makes it difficult for individuals to discern authentic from manipulated content, fostering an environment where trust in digital media erodes (Mitra et al., 2024; Shoaib et al., 2023). This erosion of trust, coupled with the rapid dissemination capabilities of social media platforms, creates fertile ground for the spread of misinformation and disinformation, impacting public perception and potentially influencing political processes (Hynek et al., 2025). The ability of generative AI to automate misinformation campaigns intensifies these risks, enabling the rapid dissemination of false narratives that further complicate detection and mitigation efforts (Radanliev et al., 2025). The accessibility of these advanced generative AI tools, even to individuals with limited technical expertise, lowers the barrier to entry for launching sophisticated misleading campaigns, including those designed for blackmail or electoral interference (Shoaib et al., 2023). The societal implications of deepfakes and misinformation generated by large language model-based generative AI are far-reaching, impacting politics, security, individual rights, and societal trust (Shoaib et al., 2023). Specifically, the hyper-realistic nature of AI-generated content, such as deepfakes, poses significant risks to political stability and social cohesion, particularly in developing societies with lower technological literacy (Toushik et al., 2025). This vulnerability is especially heightened in these regions, where misinformation and the manipulation of public sentiment could lead to the collapse of already fragile democracies (Leslie & Perini, 2024; Noor et al., 2024). The proliferation of such synthetic media can undermine journalistic integrity, erode public confidence in legitimate news sources, and amplify existing societal divisions (Ferrara, 2026). Moreover, the sophisticated nature of AI-generated misinformation makes detection increasingly challenging, as these tools can mimic human-created text and visuals with remarkable accuracy, making it difficult for the public to differentiate between authentic and fabricated content (Al-kfairy et al., 2024; Capraro et al., 2024). This challenge is compounded by the tendency of users to perceive AI outputs as objective and credible, a phenomenon known as the “machine heuristic,” which further contributes to the uncritical acceptance of fabricated information (Park & Nan, 2025). This dynamic fosters a heightened level of media skepticism, even toward reputable sources, further eroding trust and societal cohesion (Jaidka et al., 2024). The malicious deployment of advanced AI systems for generating disinformation, including highly realistic deepfakes, directly threatens democratic processes by compromising citizens’ capacity to make informed decisions regarding political representatives and issues (Bengio et al., 2024; Summerfield et al., 2024). Such capabilities, particularly when leveraged by state or non-state actors for foreign information manipulation and interference, expand the attack surface for systemic data contamination and alignment manipulation, thereby posing a formidable challenge to global information integrity (Abiri, 2025; Dikaiakos, 2025). The increasing sophistication of large language models amplifies these risks by reducing the cost and increasing the scale of disinformation campaigns, enabling the creation of synthetic media output that can disrupt online discourse and foster false majority opinions (Arda, 2024). This technological advancement not only blurs the lines between reality and fabrication but also creates psychological mistrust toward genuine content, thereby impeding constructive public discourse on critical collective issues (Effoduh, 2024; Slattery et al., 2024). This systematic distortion of the information environment undermines democratic decision-making, as an informed electorate is fundamental for effective governance (Kilian, 2024). The pervasive spread of deepfakes and AI-generated disinformation can lead to broader societal skepticism, impacting public trust in both online media and traditional news outlets (Summerfield et al., 2024). The evolution of AI, particularly in generating disinformation and automated communication, further intensifies these risks, making detection increasingly challenging (Musulan et al., 2024). This is further exacerbated by the inherent biases within AI models themselves, which can inadvertently or intentionally perpetuate and amplify disinformation narratives, leading to a skewed perception of reality (Islam et al., 2024).

References

  Abbas, F., Chesterman, S., & Taeihagh, A. (2025). Building trust in the generative AI era: a systematic review of global regulatory frameworks to combat the risks of mis-, dis-, and mal-information. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02698-9

  Abiri, G. (2025). Mutually Assured Deregulation. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.12300

  Abubakari, Y. (2025). Forgiveness-Seeking Behaviors Among Online Romance Fraudsters: Insights from Sakawa Actors in Ghana. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624×251322533

  Abubakari, Y., & Błaszczyk, M. (2023). Politicization of Economic Cybercrime: Perceptions Among Ghanaian Facebook Users. Deviant Behavior, 45(4), 483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2253487

  Achana, F. S., & Tanle, A. (2021). Experiences of Female Migrants in the Informal Sector Businesses in the Cape Coast Metropolis: Is Target 8.8 of the SDG 8 Achievable in Ghana? AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW, 6(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.14426/ahmr.v6i2.798

  Acharya, B., & Holz, T. (2024). An Explorative Study of Pig Butchering Scams. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2412.15423

  Agyare, P. (2025). Gendered Digital Harms and Youth Ideological Trajectories: Socioconomic Challenges of Digital Platforms. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(3), 77. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.9(3).77-96.2025

  Akbari, M., Kaveh, M. H., & Cousins, R. (2024). Women’s experiences of sexual harassment in the retail clothing industry: a grounded theory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1374188

  Alanazi, S., Asif, S. A. S., Caird-daley, A., & Moulitsas, I. (2025). Unmasking deepfakes: a multidisciplinary examination of social impacts and regulatory responses. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 7(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42454-025-00060-4

  Alanazi, S., Asif, S. A. S., & Moulitsas, I. (2024). Examining the Societal Impact and Legislative Requirements of Deepfake Technology: A Comprehensive Study. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2024.14.2.1194

  Alhassan, A.-R. K., & Ridwan, A. (2021). Identity Expression—the Case of ‘Sakawa’ Boys in Ghana. Human Arenas, 6(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00227-w

  Ali, A., & Alpaslan, B. (2017). Is There an Investment Motive Behind Remittances?: Evidence From Panel Cointegration. ˜The œJournal of Developing Areas, 51(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2017.0004

  Ali, A. H. S., Saidin, OK., Roisah,  ‪Kholis, & Ediwarman, E. (2021). Liability of Internet Intermediaries in Copyright Infringement: Comparison between the United States and India. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2021.2312595

  Ali, M., Fernando, Z. J., Huda, C., & Mahmutarom, M. (2025). Deepfakes and Victimology: Exploring the Impact of Digital Manipulation on Victims. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.306

  Al-kfairy, M., Mustafa, D., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., & Alfandi, O. (2024). Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Informatics, 11(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058

  Al-khazraji, S., Saleh, H. H., Khalid, A., & Mishkhal, I. (2023). Impact of Deepfake Technology on Social Media: Detection, Misinformation and Societal Implications. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 23, 429. https://doi.org/10.55549/epstem.1371792

  AllahRakha, N. (2024). Cybercrime and the Legal and Ethical Challenges of Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.191

  Anitha, S., Roy, A., & Yalamarty, H. (2017). Gender, Migration, and Exclusionary Citizenship Regimes: Conceptualizing Transnational Abandonment of Wives as a Form of Violence Against Women. Violence Against Women, 24(7), 747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217720693

  Apau, R., & Koranteng, F. N. (2020). An overview of the digital forensic investigation infrastructure of Ghana. Forensic Science International Synergy, 2, 299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.002

  Arda, S. (2024). Taxonomy to Regulation: A (Geo)Political Taxonomy for AI Risks and   Regulatory Measures in the EU AI Act. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2404.11476

  Asante, E., & Yirenkyi, S. M. (2026). Theatre for Development and Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Catalysts for Community Empowerment in Ghana. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsocial.2026.6.1.18638

  Babaei, R., Cheng, S., Duan, R., & Zhao, S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Challenge of Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Analysis. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14010017

  Baison, P. (2021). Recruitment and Job-Seeking Mechanisms for Zimbabwean Women Care Workers in the Domestic Services Sector in South Africa. AFRICAN HUMAN MOBILITY REVIEW, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14426/ahmr.v7i1.868

  Balakrishnan, V., Ahhmed, U., & Basheer, F. (2025). Personal, environmental and behavioral predictors associated with online fraud victimization among adults. PLoS ONE, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317232

  Barnor, J. N. B. (2025). Evolving networks of deception: The case of Ghanaian romance scammers. Journal of Economic Criminology, 11, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100204

  Barnor, J. N. B., Ansong, E., & Boateng, S. L. (2025). Cybercrime and socioeconomic realities: Perpetrators’ perspectives from Ghana. Journal of Economic Criminology, 11, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100205

  Barrington, C., Peterman, A., Akaligaung, A. J., Palermo, T., Milliano, M. de, & Aborigo, R. (2021). ‘Poverty can break a home’: Exploring mechanisms linking cash plus programming and intimate partner violence in Ghana. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). https://doi.org/10.17615/sbf0-zr43

  Bengio, Y., Mindermann, S., Privitera, D., Besiroglu, T., Bommasani, R., Casper, S., Choi, Y., Fox, P., Garfinkel, B., Goldfarb, D. A., Heidari, H., Ho, A., Kapoor, S., Khalatbari, L., Longpre, S., Manning, S., Mavroudis, V., Mazeika, M., Michael, J., … Zeng, Y. (2025). International AI Safety Report. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.17805

  Bengio, Y., Mindermann, S., Privitera, D., Besiroglu, T., Bommasani, R., Casper, S., Choi, Y., Goldfarb, D. A., Heidari, H., Khalatbari, L., Longpre, S., Mavroudis, V., Mazeika, M., Ng, T., Okolo, C. T., Raji, D., Skeadas, T., Tramèr, F., Adekanmbi, B., … Zhang, Y.-Q. (2024). International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Interim   Report). arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2412.05282

  Bish, A., Cockbain, E., Walsh, P. W., & Borrion, H. (2024). Exploring the ‘Blurred Boundary’: Human Smuggling and Trafficking on the Central Mediterranean Route to Europe. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 5(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.214

  Borges, G. M. (2023). Journey of Violence: Refugee Women’s Experiences Across Three Stages and Places. Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l Integration et de La Migration Internationale, 25(2), 673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01102-z

  Borges, G. M. (2024a). Fighting back, moving forward: Refugee women’s agency in stories of resistance and resilience. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3835058/v1

  Borges, G. M. (2024b). Refugee women’s holistic identity: A contemporary perspective on the process of becoming a refugee woman. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3856468/v1

  Boucher, A. (2024). Migrant sexual precarity through the lens of workplace litigation. Gender Work and Organization, 32(1), 458. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13160

  Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. QMiP Bulletin, 1(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36

  Capraro, V., Lentsch, A., Acemoğlu, D., Akgün, S., Akhmedova, A., Bilancini, E., Bonnefon, J., Brañas‐Garza, P., Butera, L., Douglas, K. M., Everett, J. A. C., Gigerenzer, G., Greenhow, C., Hashimoto, D. A., Holt‐Lunstad, J., Jetten, J., Johnson, S., Longoni, C., Lunn, P., … Viale, R. (2024). The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Socioeconomic Inequalities and Policy Making. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4666103

  Casu, M., Guarnera, L., Caponnetto, P., & Battiato, S. (2023). GenAI Mirage: The Impostor Bias and the Deepfake Detection Challenge in the Era of Artificial Illusions. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2312.16220

  Cerezo, A., Cummings, M., Holmes, M., & Williams, C. (2019). Identity as Resistance: Identity Formation at the Intersection of Race, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319875977

  Chadambuka, C., Namyalo, P. K., Raghunauth, R., Arora, N., Kouyoumdjian, F. G., & Essue, B. M. (2025). Precarious employment and gender-based violence against migrant women: A scoping review mapping the intersections. PLoS ONE, 20(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337690

  Channamallu, S. S., Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., & Hladik, G. (2025). Understanding user satisfaction with university parking: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Urban Mobility, 8, 100136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100136

  Ching, D., Twomey, J. G., Aylett, M. P., Quayle, M., Linehan, C., & Murphy, G. (2025). Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review. PLoS ONE, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320124

  Christianson, M., Teiler, Å., & Eriksson, C. (2020). “A woman’s honor tumbles down on all of us in the family, but a man’s honor is only his”: young women’s experiences of patriarchal chastity norms. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 16(1), 1862480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1862480

  Christodorescu, M., Craven, R., Feizi, S., Gong, N. Z., Hoffmann, M. R., Jha, S., Jiang, Z., Kamarposhti, M. S., Mitchell, J. B., Newman, J., Probasco, E., Qi, Y., Shams, K., & Turek, M. (2024). Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.12999

  Cimino, F., & Degani, P. (2023). Gendered impacts of the war in Ukraine: identifying potential, presumed or actual women victims of trafficking at the Italian borders. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2023.1099208

  Coetzer-Liversage, A., Stein, L. A. R., Stephens, M., Jefferis, E., Step, M. M., Crowe, A. R., & Sloboda, Z. (2024). A Human-centered innovation process (HCIP) for evidence-based substance use prevention intervention implementation. Health Behavior Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1265

  Cole, R. (2024). A qualitative investigation of the emotional, physiological, financial, and legal consequences of online romance scams in the United States. Journal of Economic Criminology, 6, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100108

  Conteh, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Applications. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2024.1401

  Cross, C. (2018). Victims’ motivations for reporting to the ‘fraud justice network.’ Police Practice and Research, 19(6), 550. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1507891

  Degani, P., Stefani, P., & Freedman, J. (2022). Editorial: Mapping vulnerability amid mixed migration flows. The reality of severe labor exploitation from a human rights perspective. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.1073606

  Deldar-Abad-Paskeh, M., Morales, F., Pedraza-Romero, I. M., Salimi-Leisner, N., Sánchez-Fidalgo, S., Gil, C. G., & Ávalos-Torres, A. (2025). A community-based strategy for the prevention of gender-based violence with people who live in vulnerable conditions in Seville, Spain. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1643070

  Demetis, D. S., & Kietzmann, J. (2021). Online Child Sexual Exploitation: A New MIS Challenge. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00652

  Deshingkar, P., Awumbila, M., & Teye, J. K. (2019). Victims of trafficking and modern slavery or agents of change? Migrants, brokers, and the state in Ghana and Myanmar. Journal of the British Academy, 77. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/007s1.077

  Dikaiakos, M. D. (2025). Generative AI as a Disinformation Tool. Politikon IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.61.con3

  Ding, M. D., & Suresh, H. (2025). The Malicious Technical Ecosystem: Exposing Limitations in Technical   Governance of AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Images of Adults. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2504.17663

  Ding, M. L., & Suresh, H. (2025). The Malicious Technical Ecosystem: Exposing Limitations in Technical Governance of AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Images of Adults. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2504.17663

  Ding, M. L., Suresh, H., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2026). How to Stop Playing Whack-a-Mole: Mapping the Ecosystem of Technologies Facilitating AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Images. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2602.04759

  Dı́az-Garcı́a, J. A., & Carvalho, J. P. (2025). A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language   models and large language models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.05443

  Doyle, D. M., Murphy, C., Murphy, M., Coppari, P. R., & Wechsler, R. J. (2018). ‘I Felt Like She Owns Me’: Exploitation and Uncertainty in the Lives of Labour Trafficking Victims in Ireland. The British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy025

  Dube, D. P., & Mohanty, R. P. (2022). Application of grounded theory in construction of factors of internal efficiency and external effectiveness of cyber security and developing impact models. Organizational Cybersecurity Journal Practice Process and People, 3(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1108/ocj-04-2022-0009

  Dunn, S. (2024). Legal Definitions of Intimate Images in the Age of Sexual Deepfakes and Generative AI. McGill Law Journal, 69(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.26443/law.v69i4.1626

  Dwight, J. (2023). Ecommerce Fraud Incident Response: A Grounded Theory Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management, 18, 173. https://doi.org/10.28945/5110

  Effoduh, J. O. (2024). The Role and Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Extremist Fuelled Election Misinformation in Africa. https://doi.org/10.32920/25378333

  ElDidi, H., Biljon, C. van, Alvi, M., Ringler, C., Ratna, N. N., Abdulrahim, S., Kilby, P., Wu, J., & Choudhury, Z. ul A. (2022). Reducing vulnerability to forced labour and trafficking of women migrant workers from South- to West-Asia. Development in Practice, 33(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2022.2059448

  Ennin, D., & Mensah, R. O. (2019). Cybercrime in Ghana and the Reaction of the Law. Journal of Law Policy and Globalization. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlpg/84-04

  Fabbri, C., Stöckl, H., Jones, K., Cook, H., Galez-Davis, C., Grant, N. R., Lo, Y., & Zimmerman, C. (2023). Labor Recruitment and Human Trafficking: Analysis of a Global Trafficking Survivor Database. International Migration Review, 57(2), 629. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183221139120

  Fatima, F., Hyatt, J. C., Rehman, S. U., Cruz, E. D. L., Nadella, G. S., & Meduri, K. (2024). Resilience and risk management in cybersecurity: A grounded theory study of emotional, psychological, and organizational dynamics. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.08.004

  Fernandes, Â., Gonçalves, M., & Matos, M. (2021a). Exploring Human Trafficking Victimization Experiences in Portugal. Victims & Offenders, 16(5), 746. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.1880509

  Fernandes, Â., Gonçalves, M., & Matos, M. (2021b). “Labor Trafficking in Portugal: Victims Perceptions of Formal Support, Post-victimization and Impact.” Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2010323

  Fernández‐Sánchez, H., James, J., Zahoui, Z., Ging, L., Vásquez-Ventura, I. S., Stockton, J., & Maria, D. S. (2025). Labor trafficking among migrant populations: a scoping review and qualitative interview study with stakeholders. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1620713

  Ferrara, E. (2024a). Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Online Election Interference. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4883403

  Ferrara, E. (2024b). Charting the Landscape of Nefarious Uses of Generative Artificial   Intelligence for Online Election Interference. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.01862

  Ferrara, E. D. (2026). The Generative AI Paradox: GenAI and the Erosion of Trust, the Corrosion of Information Verification, and the Demise of Truth. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2601.00306

  Fletcher, D., & Trautrims, A. (2023). Recruitment Deception and the Organization of Labor for Exploitation: A Policy–Theory Synthesis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 38(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0043

  Fletcher, R., Tzani, C., & Ιωάννου, Μ. (2024). The dark side of Artificial Intelligence – Risks arising in dating applications. Assessment and Development Matters, 16(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsadm.2024.16.1.17

  Furizal, F., Ma’arif, A., Maghfiroh, H., Suwarno, I., Prayogi, D., Kariyamin, K., Lonang, S., & Sharkawy, A. (2025). Social, legal, and ethical implications of AI-Generated deepfake pornography on digital platforms: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101882

  Garcia, J. M. S. (2025). Exploring Deepfakes and Effective Prevention Strategies: A Critical Review [Review of Exploring Deepfakes and Effective Prevention Strategies: A Critical Review]. Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal, 33(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330107

  George, A. (2024). Defamation in the Time of Deepfakes. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 45(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.52214/cjgl.v45i1.13186

  Gewinner, I., & Salvino, S. (2021). Understanding Patterns of Economic Insecurity for Post-Soviet Migrant Women in Europe. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.614713

  Geymonat, G. G., Marchetti, S., & Palumbo, L. (2023). Migrant women workers in Europe: forms of irregularity and conditions of vulnerability. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (p. 215). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377509.00028

  Ghann, P., Owiredu, J. O., & laryea, S. A. (2022). The Effect of Cybercrime on Financial Institutions: A Case Study of Mumuadu Rural Bank, Osino in the Fanteakwa District – Eastern Region, Ghana. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2209860/v1

  Gonzales, L. P., & Palomino, K. M. H. (2023). Criminología de género en la trata de personas en su condición de mujer migrante. Revista de Climatología, 23, 1032. https://doi.org/10.59427/rcli/2023/v23cs.1032-1042

  Gore, E. (2021). From recognising health rights to realising labour protections? Sex work, ILOAIDS and the Decent Work Agenda in Ghana. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(3), 340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00016-9

  Gregory, K., Mielke, J. G., & Neiterman, E. (2025). Improving spaces for women first responders: A grounded theory on gender equity. PLoS ONE, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330849

  Guidi, C. F., & Berti, F. (2023). Labor exploitation in the Italian agricultural sector: the case of vulnerable migrants in Tuscany. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1234873

  Hart-Johnson, A. (2017). Gaining Access to Socially Stigmatized Samples. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2180

  Henry, N., Gavey, N., & Johnson, K. (2022). Image-Based Sexual Abuse as a Means of Coercive Control: Victim-Survivor Experiences. Violence Against Women, 29, 1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221114918

  Hynek, N., Gavurová, B., & Kubák, M. (2025). Risks and benefits of artificial intelligence deepfakes: Systematic review and comparison of public attitudes in seven European Countries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(5), 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100782

  Islam, F., & Fay, S. (2024). Intersectional challenges in post-trafficking reintegration of survivor women of trafficking. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(10), 1777. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2372398

  Islam, F., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Exploring the socio-economic vulnerability model: a multi-stakeholder analysis of women’s trafficking in Bangladesh. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2549477

  Islam, Md. R., Haseeb, M., Batool, H., Ahtasham, N., & Muhammad, Z. (2024). AI Threats to Politics, Elections, and Democracy: A Blockchain-Based Deepfake Authenticity Verification Framework. Blockchains, 2(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains2040020

  Jackson, K. T., Parkinson, S., Jackson, B., & Mantler, T. (2018). Examining the Impact of Trauma-Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Perinatal Mental Health Outcomes Among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence (The PATH Study): Protocol for a Feasibility Study. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9820

  Jaidka, K., Chen, T., Chesterman, S., Hsu, W., Kan, M., Kankanhalli, M., Lee, M. L., Seres, G., Sim, T., Taeihagh, A., Tung, A. K. H., Xiao, X., & Yue, A. (2024). Misinformation, Disinformation, and Generative AI: Implications for Perception and Policy. Digital Government Research and Practice, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689372

  Jaraba, M. (2024). The nexus of women and ‘Clan Crime’: unravelling the dynamics and constraints. Trends in Organized Crime. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-024-09530-8

  Johannes, A. E., Kusumasari, B., Hadna, A. H., & Retnandari, N. D. (2023). Human Trafficking: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda [Review of Human Trafficking: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda]. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 27(2), 107. Gadjah Mada University. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.84709

  Jops, P., Lenette, C., & Breckenridge, J. (2016). A Context of Risk: Uncovering the Lived Experiences of Chin Refugee Women Negotiating a Livelihood in Delhi. Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge, 32(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40348

  Joyce, A. (2019). WORKING ACROSS BORDERS: THE LIMITS OF LABOUR LAW FOR LOW-WAGE TEMPORARY MIGRANT WORKERS. REI – REVISTA ESTUDOS INSTITUCIONAIS, 5(2), 699. https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v5i2.377

  Kalpokas, I., Šalaševičiūtė, V., & Lipskė, M. (2024). Technology as a Threat or a Solution? The Challenges of Responding to Synthetic Media. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 16(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2023-0010

  Karakaş, Ö. (2024). The Persistence of Gender Inequality in e-Science: The Case of eSec. Minerva, 62(4), 611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09530-6

  Kaur, S., & Kumar, V. (2024). Consumer Protection and Deep Fakes – Assessing the Rights and Remedies for Victims in India. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(4), 1032. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.59830

  Khamzin, A., Khamzina, Z., Nurmanbetkyzy, Z., Kenzhibekova, E., & Buribayev, Y. (2023). Assessing the Vulnerability to Human Trafficking Amidst Migration Patterns: A Case Study of Kazakhstan. Danube, 14(4), 317. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2023-0019

  Khan, N., Nguyen, T., Bermak, A., & Khalil, I. (2025). Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2507.21157

  Khatiwada, P., Washington, J., Walsh, T. N., Hamed, A. S., & Bhatta, L. (2025). The Ethical Implications of AI in Creative Industries: A Focus on AI-Generated Art. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2507.05549

  Kibuku, R., Ochieng, D. O., & Wausi, A. (2021). Developing an e-Learning Theory for Interaction and Collaboration Using Grounded Theory: A Methodological Approach. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4739

  Kilian, K. A. (2024). Beyond Accidents and Misuse: Decoding the Structural Risk Dynamics of   Artificial Intelligence. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.14873

  Kira, B. (2024a). Deepfakes, the Weaponisation of AI Against Women and Possible Solutions. https://doi.org/10.59704/9987d92e2c183c7f

  Kira, B. (2024b). When non-consensual intimate deepfakes go viral: The insufficiency of the UK Online Safety Act. Computer Law & Security Review, 54, 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106024

  Klabbers, R. E., Hughes, A., Dank, M., O’Laughlin, K. N., Rogers, M., & Stoklosa, H. (2023). Human trafficking risk factors, health impacts, and opportunities for intervention in Uganda: a qualitative analysis. Global Health Research and Policy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00332-z

  Kokolaki, E., & Fragopoulou, P. (2025). Unveiling AI’s Threats to Child Protection: Regulatory efforts to   Criminalize AI-Generated CSAM and Emerging Children’s Rights Violations. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00433

  Laffier, J., & Rehman, A. (2023). Deepfakes and Harm to Women. Journal of Digital Life and Learning, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.51357/jdll.v3i1.218

  Langmagne, S., Tenkorang, E. Y., & Elabor-Idemudia, P. (2019). High HIV/AIDS Prevalence in a Suburban Area in Ghana: A Context Analysis of Its Relationship to Human Trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 7(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2019.1703092

  Lazarus, S. (2019a). Just Married: The Synergy between Feminist Criminology and the Tripartite Cybercrime Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718426

  Lazarus, S. (2019b). Just married: the synergy between feminist criminology and the Tripartite Cybercrime Framework. International Social Science Journal, 69(231), 15. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12201

  Lazarus, S., Button, M., Garba, K. H., Soares, A. B., & Hughes, M. (2025). Strategic business movements? The migration of online romance fraudsters from Nigeria to Ghana. Journal of Economic Criminology, 7, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100128

  Lazarus, S., Chiang, M., & Button, M. (2025). Assessing Human Trafficking and Cybercrime Intersections Through Survivor Narratives. Deviant Behavior, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2025.2470402

  Lazarus, S., Hughes, M., Button, M., & Garba, K. H. (2025). Fraud as Legitimate Retribution for Colonial Injustice: Neutralization Techniques in Interviews with Police and Online Romance Fraud Offenders. Deviant Behavior, 47(3), 427. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2446328

  Lebni, J. Y., Irandoost, S. F., Ziapour, A., Ahmadi, A., Mehedi, N., & Azizi, S. A. (2023). Identification of causes and consequences of Kolberi among Iranian Kurdish women: a grounded theory study. BMC Women s Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02791-5

  Leslie, D., & Perini, A. (2024). Future Shock: Generative AI and the International AI Policy and Governance Crisis. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.88b4cc98

  Lewis, H., Dwyer, P., Hodkinson, S., & Waite, L. (2014). Hyper-precarious lives. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), 580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514548303

  Li, Q., McDonald, A., Haimson, O. L., Schoenebeck, S., & Gilbert, É. (2024). The Sociotechnical Stack: Opportunities for Social Computing Research in   Non-consensual Intimate Media. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.03585

  Li, Q., Zhang, S., Kasper, A. T., Ashkinaze, J., Eaton, A. A., Schoenebeck, S., & Gilbert, É. (2024). Reporting Non-Consensual Intimate Media: An Audit Study of Deepfakes. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.12138

  Littman, M. K., & Kessler, G. C. (2011). Judges’ Awareness, Understanding, and Application of Digital Evidence. ˜The œjournal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2011.1088

  Luong, H. T. (2025). “Simple job, high salary”: unveiling the complexity of scam-forced criminality in Southeast Asia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05605-1

  Mármol, C. J., Maldonado, A. L., & Legáz, I. (2025). Disproportionate Cybersexual Victimization of Women from Adolescence into Midlife in Spain: Implications for Targeted Protection and Prevention. Behavioral Sciences, 15(11), 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111571

  Massari, M., Gatta, G. L., Miceli, S., & Cabras, F. (2025). Embodied experiences of lived citizenship beyond the European privilege. The case-study of Romanian women farmworkers in eastern Sicily. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1558541

  Mbamba, C. R., Ndemole, I. K., Hassan, S. M., Arthur, I., & Mountz, S. (2022). Practice approaches to combat child trafficking in trafficking-sensitive areas in Ghana: Experiences of practitioners involved in child trafficking interventions. Children and Youth Services Review, 140, 106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106582

  Mensah, R. O., Kingful, P., & Mensah, G. S. (2024a). The Nexus between Multilingualism and Criminality in Ghana, West Africa: A Qualitative Analysis through the Lens of Symbolic Interactionism Theory. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4939817/v1

  Mensah, R. O., Kingful, P., & Mensah, G. S. (2024b). The nexus between multilingualism and criminality in West Africa through the lens of symbolic interactionism theory. Discover Global Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00118-9

  Mensah, R. O., Mensah, P., & Opoku, D. (2023). Experiences and perceptions of cybercrime victims in Ghana: The Perspective of digital consumers of agricultural produce. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2285623

  Mensah, R. O., Opoku, D., & Boateng, W. (2025). Sociological exploration into sexual crime exploitation among underage vulnerable girls in Ghana. Discover Global Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00163-y

  Mészáros, A. Á., & Kelemen-Erdős, A. (2023). Industrial espionage from a human factor perspective. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 16(3), 97. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-3/5

  Mezei, K., & Szentgáli-Tóth, B. (2023). Some Comments on the Legal Regulation on Misinformation and Cyber Attacks Conducted Through Online Platforms. Lexonomica, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.15.1.33-52.2023

  Miotti, A., & Wasil, A. R. (2024). Combatting deepfakes: Policies to address national security threats and   rights violations. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.09581

  Mistrust. (2018). In transcript Verlag eBooks. Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839439234

  Mitra, A., Mohanty, S. P., & Kougianos, E. (2024). The World of Generative AI: Deepfakes and Large Language Models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.04373

  Mohajan, H. K. (2022). FEMINISM and FEMINIST GROUNDED THEORY: A Comprehensive Research Analysis. Journal of Economic Development Environment and People, 11(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v11i3.774

  Moore, D. M. (2024). Algorithmic Exploitation in Social Media Human Trafficking and Strategies for Regulation. Laws, 13(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13030031

  Moreno, F. R. (2024). Deepfake Fraud Detection: Safeguarding Trust in Generative Ai. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5031627

  Moreno, F. R. (2025). Deepfake detection in generative AI: A legal framework proposal to protect human rights. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, 106162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106162

  Mpuru, L., & Kgoale, C. (2025). Recognizing the Evolving Cybercrime Threats in South Africa. African Security, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2025.2515302

  Musulan, A., Xia, V., Kosak-Hine, E., Gibbs, T., Sujaya, V., Rabbany, R., Godbout, J., & Pelrine, K. (2024). Online Influence Campaigns: Strategies and Vulnerabilities. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.10387

  Mutola, S., Pemunta, N. V., Ngo, N. V., Otang, O. I., & Tabenyang,  tabi-C. J. (2021). The Plight of Female Cameroonian Migrant Sex Workers in N’Djamena, Chad: A Case of Intersectionality. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 24(2), 430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-021-01216-5

  Mythili, K., & Nagamani, K. (2025). Safeguarding women in digital spaces: Legal responses to cyber harassment and objectification on social media. Development Policy Review, 43(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70039

  Navigating the Dual Nature of Deepfakes: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence AI) Technology. (2024). International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology., 3(10), 19. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i10.54

  Netshivhambe, N. E. (2024). Multiculturalism and Cultural Tolerance. In IntechOpen eBooks. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006674

  Nicola, H., & Alice, W. (2021). Governing Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Digital Platform Policies, Tools, and Practices (p. 749). https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211054

  Noor, L., Malahat, I., & Noor, H. (2024). The Socio-Political Implications of Deepfakes in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4963439

  Oak, R., & Shafiq, Z. (2025). “Hello, is this Anna?”: Unpacking the Lifecycle of Pig-Butchering Scams. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.20821

  Ofosu, G., Torbor, M., & Sarpong, D. (2022). Gender and artisanal and small-scale mining: Exploring women’s livelihood and occupational roles in formalised settings. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.013

  Okolie-Osemene, J. (2017). A Study on Human Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation within the Gulf of Guinea countries. HAL (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03376680

  Olivo, V. E., Parada, H., & Bravo, F. (2021). “I Don’t Want Anyone to Follow My Path:” Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the Dominican Republic. Journal of Human Trafficking, 10(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2021.1959757

  Opperdoes, M., Dellenborg, L., Backman, G., Ascher, H., & Greenbrook, J. T. V. (2025). “Vulnerable and strong at the same time”: Forcibly displaced young women’s lived experiences of their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) as unaccompanied girls seeking asylum in Sweden. PLOS Global Public Health, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005241

  Özer, M., Kucukkaya, G., Köse, Y., Mukasheva, A., Ciris, K., & Penumatcha, B. V. (2025). Mapping Trafficking Networks: A Data-Driven Approach to Disrupt Human   Trafficking Post Russia-Ukraine Conflict. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2504.17050

  Park, S., & Nan, X. (2025). Generative AI and misinformation: a scoping review of the role of generative AI in the generation, detection, mitigation, and impact of misinformation. AI & Society, 41(2), 1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02620-3

  Qiwei, L., Zhang, S., Pratt, S. I., Kasper, A. T., Gilbert, É., & Schoenebeck, S. (2024). A Law of One’s Own: The Inefficacy of the DMCA for Non-Consensual   Intimate Media. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.13575

  Qureshi, K. (2024). A Multidisciplinary Threats to Emerging Cybersecurity, Legal and Ethical Threats Posed by Deepfake Technology. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(9), 574. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64202

  Radanliev, P., Santos, O., & Ani, U. (2025). Generative AI cybersecurity and resilience. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1568360. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1568360

  Raigrodski, D. (2015). Economic Migration Gone Wrong: Trafficking in Persons Through the Lens of Gender, Labor, and Globalization. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 25(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.18060/7909.0006

  Rakha, N. A. (2024). Cybercrime and the Law: Addressing the Challenges of Digital Forensics in Criminal Investigations. Mexican Law Review, 23. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2024.2.18892

  Romanishyn, A., Malytska, O., & Goncharuk, V. A. (2025). AI-driven disinformation: policy recommendations for democratic resilience. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1569115. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1569115

  Rossoni, I., & Woude, M. van der. (2025). Resisting “Manufactured” Vulnerability: Discretionary Policing and Migrant Sex Workers’ Resistance Strategies in Malta. International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3909

  Sagor, L., & Aktar, N. (2023). Navigating Gendered Pathways: Uncovering Gendered Barriers for Women Migrants in Europe. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 789. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70760

  Šalamon, N. K., Frelih, M., & Učkar, T. (2023). Criminality of Prostitution Abuse. Politička Misao, 60(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.60.4.03

  Samarakoon, G., Grant‐Smith, D., Mayes, R., & Wijetunga, D. (2022). An intersectional approach to understanding the inequality and subordination of Sri Lankan women apparel workers. Vidyodaya Journal of Management, 8. https://doi.org/10.31357/vjm.v8iii.6102

  Samuel-Okon, A. D., Olateju, O. O., Okon, S. U., Olaniyi, O. O., & Igwenagu, U. T. I. (2024). Formulating Global Policies and Strategies for Combating Criminal Use and Abuse of Artificial Intelligence. Archives of Current Research International, 24(5), 612. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i5735

  Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2025). Cyber Slavery Infrastructures: A Socio-Technical Study of Forced Criminality in Transnational Cybercrime. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.12814

  Scoular, J., Sanders, T., Balderston, S., Abel, G., Brents, B. G., Ellison, G., & Marriott, N. (2023). Understanding sexual violence in sex working populations—Law, legal consciousness and legal practice in four countries (2021–2023): Study Protocol v2.5. PLoS ONE, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283067

  Serughetti, G. (2018). Smuggled or Trafficked? Refugee or job seeker? Deconstructing rigid classifications by rethinking women’s vulnerability. Anti-Trafficking Review, 11. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201218112

  Sha, H., & Bhuiyan, M. R. A. (2022). “Amar beton khub e kom.” Zanj The Journal of Critical Global South Studies, 5. https://doi.org/10.13169/zanjglobsoutstud.5.1.0012

  Shahzad, S. A., Hashmi, A., Peng, Y.-T., Tsao, Y., & Wang, H. (2024). How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative   Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2411.09266

  Sharpless, L., Kershaw, T., Knight, D., Campbell, J. K., Phillips, K., Katague, M., & Willie, T. C. (2024). Moving towards transformative justice for black women survivors of intimate partner violence: an intersectional qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20244-y

  Shepherd, D. A., Parida, V., Williams, T., & Wincent, J. (2021). Organizing the Exploitation of Vulnerable People: A Qualitative Assessment of Human Trafficking. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2421. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211046908

  Shi, D., Shen, T., Huang, Y., Li, Z., Leng, Y., Jin, R., Liu, C., Wu, X., Guo, Z., Yu, L., Shi, L., Jiang, B., & Xiong, D. (2024). Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2412.17686

  Shoaib, M. R., Wang, Z., Ahvanooey, M. T., & Zhao, J. (2023a). Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Models. https://doi.org/10.1109/icca59364.2023.10401723

  Shoaib, M. R., Wang, Z., Ahvanooey, M. T., & Zhao, J. (2023b). Deepfakes, Misinformation, and Disinformation in the Era of Frontier AI, Generative AI, and Large AI Models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.17394

  Singh, S., & Dhumane, A. (2025). Unmasking digital deceptions: An integrative review of deepfake detection, multimedia forensics, and cybersecurity challenges [Review of Unmasking digital deceptions: An integrative review of deepfake detection, multimedia forensics, and cybersecurity challenges]. MethodsX, 15, 103632. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103632

  Sippy, T., Enock, F. E., Bright, J., & Margetts, H. (2024). Behind the Deepfake: 8% Create; 90% Concerned. Surveying public exposure   to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.05529

  Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Grundy, E. A. C., Graham, J., Noetel, M., Uuk, R., Dao, J., Pour, S., Casper, S., & Thompson, N. (2024). The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and   Taxonomy of Risks From Artificial Intelligence. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2408.12622

  Stephenson, S., Ramjit, L., Ristenpart, T., & Dell, N. (2025). Digital Technologies and Human Trafficking: Combating Coercive Control and Navigating Digital Autonomy. 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713544

  Sugiura, L., Button, M., Nurse, J. R. C., Tapley, J., Sağlam, R. B., Hawkins, C., Frederick, B., & Blackbourn, D. (2024). The technification of domestic abuse: Methods, tools and criminal justice responses. Criminology & Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958241266760

  Sulaj, A. (2025). Legal Responses to Challenges Posed by Deepfakes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5146075

  Summerfield, C., Argyle, L. P., Bakker, M. A., Collins, T., Durmus, E., Eloundou, T., Gabriel, I., Ganguli, D., Hackenburg, K., Hadfield, G. K., Hewitt, L., Huang, S., Landemore, H., Marchal, N., Ovadya, A., Procaccia, A. D., Risse, M., Schneier, B., Seger, E., … Botvinick, M. (2024). How will advanced AI systems impact democracy? arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2409.06729

  The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse. (2021). In Emerald Publishing Limited eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781839828485

  Thumboo, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2024). Digital romance fraud targeting unmarried women. Discover Global Society, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00132-x

  Toushik, W., Azmine, Nesa, P., Rahatun, Absar, K., Mahir, Abdur, R., & Rafia, I., Mst. (2025). Seeing Isn’t Believing: Addressing the Societal Impact of Deepfakes in Low-Tech Environments. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.16618

  Umbach, R., Henry, N., Beard, G., & Berryessa, C. M. (2024). Attitudes Towards and Knowledge of Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate   Imagery in 10 Countries. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.01721

  Urone, C., Passiglia, G., Graceffa, G., & Miano, P. (2023). Pathways of Self-Determination: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study of Slut-shaming Vulnerability in a Group of Young Adults. Sexuality & Culture, 28(4), 1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10180-1

  Venkateswarulu, S., & Srinagesh, A. (2024). DeepExplain: Enhancing DeepFake Detection Through Transparent and Explainable AI model. Informatica, 48(8). https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v48i8.5792

  Vijeyarasa, R. (2016). Sex, Slavery and the Trafficked Woman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315608501

  Viola, M., & Voto, C. (2023). Designed to abuse? Deepfakes and the non-consensual diffusion of intimate images. Synthese, 201(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04012-2

  Virkkunen, J., & Piipponen, M. (2021). Informal practices and the rule of law. In Routledge eBooks (p. 192). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003176763-14

  Wang, F. (2024). Victim-offender overlap: the identity transformations experienced by trafficked Chinese workers escaping from pig-butchering scam syndicate. Trends in Organized Crime. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-024-09525-5

  Wang, L., Wanyu, H., Li, Y., Huimin, Q., Li, Z., Qinchen, J., Wang, T., Wang, F., Minghao, P., & Zhu, W. (2023). Research on the mechanism of short video information interaction behavior of college students with psychological disorders based on grounded theory. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 2256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17211-4

  Watts, A., Rock, S., Gately, N., & Smith, A. M. A. (2025). Barriers to Family and Domestic Violence Support for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women in Australia: A Systematic Review [Review of Barriers to Family and Domestic Violence Support for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women in Australia: A Systematic Review]. Journal of Family Violence. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-00976-0

  Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2015). The online dating romance scam: The psychological impact on victims – both financial and non-financial. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895815603773

  Wolbers, H., Cubitt, T., Cahill, M. T., Ball, M., Hancock, J. M., Napier, S., & Broadhurst, R. (2024). Drivers and deterrents of child sexual offending: Analysis of offender interactions on the darknet. In Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks. https://doi.org/10.52922/ti77659

  Yang, C. (2023). Digital Exclusion, Gender Oppression, and How Social Workers can Advocate for Digital Feminism in China. Columbia Social Work Review, 21(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.52214/cswr.v21i1.11205

  Zengenene, M. (2020). Trafficking of women and girls in the District of Seke: Lessons from the Zimbabwe’s Second Republic. Masyarakat Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 33(3), 256. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v33i32020.256-265

  Zhang, L., & Shen, T. (2025). Identity negotiation on the LIHKG platform: a grounded theory study of Mainland Chinese immigrants’ adaptation to Hong Kong society. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1643942

  Zou, Y., Li, P., Li, Z., Huang, H., Cui, X., Liu, X., Zhang, C., & He, R. (2025). Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.05240