Categories: NEWS

Professor Henry Kwasi Prempeh, Executive Director, CDD-Ghana’s opinion on the decision by the Judicial….


Read Time: 2 minutes
Professor Henry Kwasi Prempeh

So, now members of the Ghana Bar cannot offer a personal unflattering opinion of the judiciary on an academic, a civil society or other public discussion platfrom, even after a case has been decided, without risking being hauled before the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council? Really?

On the same platform where this lawyer expressed the opinion that has earned him an invitation to appear before the Disciplinary Committee of the legal profession’s regulator, other panelists, including other lawyers, strongly disagreed with him in his opinion of the judiciary regarding the case under discussion, with some praising the court’s handling of the matter. In other words, the platform on which the lawyer spoke was a veritable marketplace of ideas and opinion, with panelists debating each other in frank, open dialogue.

This, incidentally, was a webinar discussion organized by CDD-Ghana, in collaboration with the KNUST law faculty, as part of a new “Judicial Review” series (a partnership between CDD and two law faculties in Ghana) that aims to review and examine decisions of the courts for their impact on democracy and good governance. This particular panel, which examined the recent Ghana election petition through a comparative lens, featured two foreign participants (from Kenya and Zimbabwe), four Ghanaian lawyers, and me.

That an opinion expressed at such a forum, to contestation from other participants, would cause anyone to lodge a formal complaint with the Disciplinary Committee of the General Legal Council is unprecedented, bizarre, and ill-advised. Not only is this bound to have a chilling effect on the free speech rights of lawyers, it will also impact negatively on both academic freedom and the freedom and ability of civil society to promote judicial accountability, including through projects like the Judicial Review series. I find no justification whatsoever for the Disciplinary Committee of the GLC to be brought into this matter or to investigate Dr. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine for the opinion he expressed on the panel. It cannot be ok for a lawyer to praise a court for its handling of a matter but an act of professional misconduct–or contempt of court–for another lawyer to express a contrary view of the same court about the same matter.


Godfred Meba

Recent Posts

International Day of Yoga: Volta Regional Minister entreats citizens to embrace yoga for its health benefits

By: Prince-Kelvin Setrick The Volta Region’s commemoration of this year’s International Yoga Day has seen…

3 hours ago

Mary Tagba confirmed as Tatale DCE, pledges improved education and youth development

By: Braimah Abdul Majeed The people of Tatale have officially welcomed Mary Tagba as their…

3 hours ago

Hospitals in Nkwanta South has been closed down due to renewed conflict at the area

Nkwanta South municipal hospital and St Joseph hospital, the two main hospitals in Nkwanta South…

3 days ago

Frente POLISARIO UN Representative: Desperation is what leads the occupying state to intensify its hostile campaigns against the Sahrawi people

New York (United Nations), 29 June 2025 (SPS) –Interviewed by Sahara Press Service (SPS) today,…

3 days ago

BBC Revealed that Togolese do not believe ECOWAS serves their interest

The British Broadcasting Corporation (#BBC) reports that a credible survey has revealed that a majority…

1 week ago

The US strikes on Iran will increase nuclear weapons proliferation

Vijay Prashad on why the US attack on Iran was illegal and why the attack…

1 week ago