British Army soldiers who were blamed for starting massive 10,000 acre bushfire in Kenya while ‘high on cocaine’ lose fight for diplomatic immunity


Read Time: 2 minutes

The British Army has lost its right to diplomatic immunity against lawsuits in Kenya in a landmark ruling over a massive bushfire allegedly caused by ‘cocaine-taking’ UK soldiers based in the African country. 

A huge wildfire at Lolldaiga Hills Ranch, a 49,000-acre sanctuary which houses the Nanyuki army base used by Britain for military drills, broke out in March last year and caused widespread devastation, putting more than 1,000 locals at risk of drought.

In the ensuing chaos, Linus Murangiri, an employee of Lolldaiga conservancy, was crushed to death by a vehicle as he rushed to help put out the fire, leaving behind his wife and two sons.

The African Centre for Corrective and Preventive Action (ACCPA) brought legal action against BATUK seeking compensation and reparations, alleging that the fire was ’caused by agents of the British Army Training Unit Kenya who tested positive for cocaine’.

BATUK denies its soldiers caused the fire and claimed they were protected from prosecution by diplomatic immunity. 

But in a landmark ruling, Kenyan High Court Judge Antonina Bore argued that the UK Government waived diplomatic immunity to legal action by signing an agreement in 2015 governing the terms under which its soldiers would be allowed to operate in Kenya.   

The pressure group and the locals argued that the terms of a Defence Cooperation Agreement signed seven years ago between Kenya and the UK Government was ‘equivalent to a waiver of state immunity’ in relation to civil claims brought as a result of the actions of British soldiers.

The judge agreed that ‘as a unit of the British Army, BATUK has no legal entity separate from the UK Government.

But she went on to find that the 2015 agreement did amount to a partial waiver of diplomatic immunity.

The judge said that under the terms of the agreement ‘it is evident that Kenya would have jurisdiction for civil claims and liabilities arising from activities in its territory under the agreement while the UK would have jurisdiction for civil claims and liabilities arising from activities in its territory’.


Godfred Meba

Recent Posts

Industrial Fisheries Sector Rejects Fisheries Bill

The Ghana Tuna Association (GTA), and the Ghana Industrial Trawlers Association, both representing the Joint…

13 hours ago

Asanko Gold Stokes Tension Again At Manso Tontokrom

Renewed tension is mounting in Manso Tontokrom, a mining community in the Amansie South District…

13 hours ago

GHANA SIGNS DEBT RELIEF PACKAGE WITH FRANCE WORTH 87.7 MILLION EUROS

BY: DANIEL ASARE Finance Minister, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson has touted the country’s recovery from…

1 day ago

Lands Minister Extends Deadline for Small-Scale Mining License Rectification

The Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, Hon. Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah (MP), has granted an…

1 day ago

KENNEDY AGYAPONG SPEAKS OUT!

Mr. Kennedy Agyapong Mr. Kennedy Agyapong, a presidential aspirant of the New Patriotic Party (NPP)…

1 day ago

PRATT CALLS FOR UNITED ACTION ON REPARATION

Mr. Kwesi Pratt, Jnr, a member of the Coordinating Committee of the Pan African Progressive…

2 days ago